Online Calculation Tool for Thermowell Installations

Back in 1974, the ASME (founded as the American Society of Mechanical Engineers) published a performance technology standard for thermowell calculations as well as overall temperature measurement best practices, PTC 19.3. Based on decades of industry and research data, the updated PTC 19.3 TW-2010:

…incorporates the latest theory in the areas of natural frequency, Strouhal frequency, in-line resonance and stress evaluation.

The updated standard was a collaborative effort among instrumentation suppliers including Emerson, end users, engineering contractors, and academia. The intent was to update the aging standard, which was limited in scope and simplistic. The thermowell calculation portion of ASME PTC 19.3-1974 was 4 pages. By comparison, the new standard, released in July 2010, is over 40 pages due to the explanations of theory and the sheer complexity of the process.

To help with understanding the updated standard, Emerson’s Rosemount Temperature measurement team has put together a new video and thermowell calculations website. These highlight some of the changes and make a calculation tool available for preliminary thermowell design calculations.

In the video, Emerson’s Dirk Bauschke highlights three key differences in the new standard. It includes stem profiles not previously covered in the original standard. The natural frequency calculations have been updated to reflect real-world effects from thermowell installations. The ideal natural frequency is corrected for the effects of adding a temperature sensor and mounting style. These corrections lower the effective natural frequency. Correction factors for beam correction, fluid mass, sensor mass, and mounting compliance are also elements in the corrected natural frequency calculation.

The second key change is that the Strouhal number has gone from a constant 0.22 in the original standard to a variable number, a calculation across a range of flow conditions—such as laminar or turbulent flow. As the vortex shedding frequency, or Strouhal frequency, approaches the thermowell natural frequency, the tip displacement and stresses are greatly magnified and the thermowell can fail due to the large amount of energy it must absorb.

Thermowell Installation: Fluid Induced ForcesThe third change is that the updated standard considers inline oscillations in addition to transverse or perpendicular oscillations.

As the process ramps up, it will go through the inline oscillation frequency first. If the thermowell is impacted more by this inline vibration than the transverse vibration, it becomes the new limiting factor in the thermowell design.

The resonant frequency of the thermowell must be sufficiently high so that destructive oscillations are not excited by the fluid flow. If the design requires that the thermowell pass through the in-line resonance to get to the operating conditions, there is an additional fatigue check at resonance.

This updated standard applies to all new projects and retrofit projects where there is a change in the process conditions.

The online thermowell calculation can help with preliminary calculations and official documentation with the R21 report [example]. Also, this thermowell calculations whitepaper describes the updated standard and calculations in more detail.

The Rosemount Temperature team, who performs more than 35,000 calculations for process manufacturers each year, can provide you with a formal R21 report to document the design to be in accordance with the PTC 19.3 TW standard.

MP3 | iTunes

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Related Posts:

  • Pingback: Help with API 2350 Overfill Protection Compliance | Emerson Process Experts()

  • http://www.linkedin.com/in/JimCahill Jim Cahill

    I received a question on my LinkedIn status that I wanted to include with this post, “What’s the margin between added replacement cost vs. the added accuracy?” I turned to my friends on the Rosemount Temperature team for their thoughts. Here they are:

    “The standard doesn’t provide any guidance on accuracy, but it is more conservative than the 1974 standard due to the new in-line resonance condition and in depth natural frequency calculations.Therefore, certain thermowell dimensions may need to be changed to meet the requirements of the standard and might end up impacting the accuracy. These changes include reducing the immersion length and increasing the root diameter. Users are usually more concerned about the immersion length since most have some sort of guideline they need to follow (e.g. protruding into the middle third of the pipe) to meet their accuracy requirements.

    However, new standards indicate that the shorter immersion lengths might not affect accuracy too much. The API 551 standard states an immersion length of 2” + the length of the sensing element is required. Our new temperature handbook covers accuracy vs immersion length a little more in depth (http://viewer.zmags.com/publication/b05494eb#/b05494eb/1).

    On the issue of cost of replacement vs increased safety and reliability, that the new standard is not meant to be retroactive. If a thermowell has been working in a certain process for a number of years, there is no need to perform calculations. If process conditions are going to be changed, then calculations should be performed.”

  • Pingback: API2350防溢罐保护标准 - Help with API 2350 Overfill Protection Compliance - 艾默生过程管理客户应用博文 - 艾默生365中国用户社区 - Emerson Community Site()

  • Pingback: Get Your Thermowell Questions Answered | Emerson Process Experts()