Finding the Lost Flow with Ultrasonic Technology and Remote Expertise

by Jim Cahill

Last week I did a post about pipeline surge pressure relief and a technical guide about this written by Emerson's Daniel business. They are known for gas and liquid fiscal flow measurement solutions for the oil and gas industry.

I received a nice follow up note from Dave Seiler about a Latin American refiner who was fighting turbine meter maintenance problems due to large concentrations of foreign materials in the pipeline liquid flow. The problem was so acute that they actually had to install two meters in parallel so they could switch between meters while the other was being maintained.

Daniel Ultrasonic Flow Meter InstallationThe refinery engineers worked with the local Daniel team to replace the turbine meters with a 6-inch liquid ultrasonic flow meter. These do not have moving parts, unlike the turbine meters, which were being impacted by the particulates in the flow.

I didn't know much about the ultrasonic technology in flow applications, so I googled around and found a Hydrocarbon Processing magazine article reprint, Use liquid ultrasonic meters for custody transfer, in the Daniel area of the EmersonProcess.com website.

Dave is a co-author of this paper. The article does a great job of simplifying how the ultrasonic technology works. It also includes the math on how the ultrasonic flow measurement works.

My analogy, fresh from a rafting trip down the Guadalupe River, is to imagine that you're floating down the river with an ultrasonic transducer on one bank, and another on the other bank a little further downstream. Ultrasonic pulses are sent between the two transducers in each direction. The pulse traveling across the river from the upstream one to the downstream one will obviously travel faster since it's going across the river with the current. And of course, the reverse is true; it takes longer to travel across the river going upstream against the current. With the formulas in the article and enough perseverance, you can calculate the river's flow rate from these time differences. For the 3D world of pipe flow, the authors' explain:

The resulting time difference is proportional to the fluid velocity passing through the meter spool. Single and multiple acoustic paths can be used to measure fluid velocity. Multipath meters tend to be more accurate since they collect velocity information at several points in the flow profile.

Now back to the story… after the installation of an ultrasonic flow meter, the refiners saw that the meter was reporting low flow rates when the product in the pipe switched between gasoline and diesel.

The local Daniel service technicians collected maintenance logs using their Customer Ultrasonic Interface software (CUI) and sent it to the support team in Houston for detailed analysis. The team verified that the meter was working correctly for both liquids. They deduced that the flow was being diverted somehow during the transmix, or product switchover, where both products are flowing through the pipe until the switchover has been completed. This was possible because of the meters ability to accurately measure both flow rate and speed of sound of the liquid passing through the meter with extremely high accuracy.

The refiner verified that this is what indeed was happening where this transmix was being routed away through a smaller pipeline for further reprocessing. With the age of the refinery and the retirement of experienced operators, the current operators had not been able to see this transmix operation occurring in their process. The refinery engineers were impressed that the team in Houston could deduce this from their analysis of the data.

The refinery engineers involved in this project are presenting a workshop at this year's Emerson Exchange in late September. If you face similar challenges, you might want to catch this one.

Technorati Tags: | | | | | |

April 11, 2008 in Custody Transfer, in Emerson Exchange, in Measurement, in Pipeline, in Refining | Comments (0)

Coriolis Meters in LNG Cryogenic Metering Applications

by Jim Cahill

A 2004 study by the U.S. Department of Energy shows continued global growth for the like Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) industry as one of the sources to meet global energy demand. Our Micro Motion division recently announced that Coriolis technology is ideal in cryogenic mass flow metering applications like LNG (-153.1 degC). LNG can be stored and transported much more efficiently in a liquid state than in a gaseous state.

I came across a Chemical Engineering magazine article entitled, Flow Measurement in Bitter Cold: How to Use Coriolis Meters in Cryogenic Service which better describes why Coriolis technology works well in the bitter cold of more than -100 degC.

The authors, Emerson’s Tim Patten and Keven Dunphy describe how harsh temperatures pose problems for many flow measurement technologies. These problems are related to mechanical parts, wetted seals, and materials of construction with poor impact strength. And from a measurement standpoint, it’s expensive to keep the cryogenic fluids cold, so they are kept slightly below their boiling points. As the fluid flows past an obstacle such as a valve, flashing can occur. Pockets of gas form in the liquid making flow measurement difficult at best.

Tim and Keven point out that Coriolis technology is well suited since it has no moving wetted parts, nor temperature sensitive materials, and it has the accuracy required to satisfy custody transfer regulations. They recommend careful attention be paid to the pressure drop across the meter to avoid flashing by increasing the meter size. Their rule of thumb:

…the difference between the discharge pressure and liquid vapor pressure at the fluid temperature should be maintained at a factor of at least three times the pressure drop across the meter.

The article also provides tips on density measurement limitations, insulation best practices, and non-linear compensation. These tips apply not only to LNG but other cryogenic applications like liquid helium.

Technorati Tags: | | | | |

October 16, 2006 in Custody Transfer, in LNG, in Measurement | Comments (1) | Trackback (0)

Custody Transfer in the Sarbanes-Oxley Era

by Jim Cahill

Many process manufacturers have flow metering stations where ownership of incoming raw materials, intermediates, and/or outgoing products change. This custody transfer process is common with oil and gas producers, refiners, and chemical/petrochemical manufacturers.

Accuracy is critical since these measurements impact the bottom lines for both the seller and buyer. And, with the introduction in the U. S. of the Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act of 2002, companies are required to put the controls in place to prove the accuracy of these measurements. Other countries have similar regulations requiring these documented proof-of-accuracy processes.

Robert Fallwell, a regional manager in Emerson’s Metco Services business, has written an excellent article, Sarbanes-Oxley audits: coming soon in the July issue of Control Engineering magazine.

Robert shares his expertise on how process manufacturers need to prepare for the SOX auditors. He boils it down to:

…they ask for proof that flow measurements are accurate, that you have procedures to ensure measurement accuracy, and that the plant’s operators, engineers, and production accountants have been trained in the correct procedures for the measurement control process.
The article is filled with advice on how to get ready, where to start in your process, and even 9 steps on how to comply with SOX. In addition to the expertise Robert and the METCO team bring to SOX compliance planning, Emerson has well-established flow technology and calibration management software help assure accuracy over time.

If your business is impacted by SOX or similar regulations, you’ll want to incorporate some of the ideas presented in this article.

Technorati Tags: | | | |

August 8, 2006 in Chemical, in Custody Transfer, in Measurement, in Oil & Gas, in Refining, in Regulatory Compliance | Comments (0) | Trackback (0)