I received an interesting story from Emerson’s James Beall about a process manufacturer with a process filled with many fermentors. They were being converted over from Provox control systems to DeltaV systems. pH control was a key part of the plant’s fermentation process. The first two fermentors were converted over but were now cycling. The DeltaV system was managing to keep the pH within specification but the trend charts showed excessive cycling.

Emerson’s Mark Coughran, whom you may recall from earlier posts, remotely connected the site’s system to investigate and solve the issues the manufacturer faced. Here’s a view of the pH and flow trends for a fermentor under control of each system as found:

As you can see, the tuning appears to be out of whack in the DeltaV system.

The issue was that the Provox proportional (P or gain), integral (I or reset), and derivative (D or rate) values of the PID controllers were simply converted to the corresponding units of the DeltaV tuning constant. The Provox PID controller users the Series form of PID, with PI action on error, D action on PV. The DeltaV PID controller is selectable between Series and Standard forms—but defaults to the Standard PID algorithm. Here’s a picture of the algorithms’ differences:

Also, the integral and derivative terms have different parameter units. The integral or reset action is in repeats per minute in Provox and seconds per repeat in the DeltaV system. The derivative term is in minutes in Provox and seconds in the DeltaV system.

James provided these equations to adjust the PID values between the systems. If you choose the Series Form for the DeltaV PID algorithms, the conversion equations are:

- Gain (%out/%pv) = Provox Gain %out/%pv
- Reset (sec) = 60/Provox Reset(rep/min)
- Rate (sec) = 60 x Provox Rate (min)
- PV_Filter (sec) = 60 x Provox PV_Filter (min)

If you keep the Standard form default PID algorithm, and the derivative/rate term is zero, then use the same conversions as above. If the derivative/rate term in non-zero, first convert to series tuning—same as above. Then, convert to Standard form:

- DeltaV Std. Gain = Gain x (Reset + Rate)/Reset
- DeltaV Std. Reset = Reset + Rate
- DeltaV Std. Rate = (Reset x Rate)/(Reset + Rate)

James noted that it is also important to pay close attention to the anti-reset windup limits (ARW). In DeltaV, the values are in engineering units, not percentages.

The good news is that once the converted values were applied, the fermentor’s trends looked like what they had been under Provox—”almost flat line.” Of course another option would have been to change the DeltaV PID Form to “Series”. This must be done either by downloading the module or performing an on-line change with the PID block’s mode temporarily set to “Out of Service”.

No matter what your control system modernization path may be, make sure you check the PID algorithm forms in the old and new system as well as any changes in units. Hopefully sharing James’ findings in this post will help someone facing similar issues.

**Update: **I’ve updated the post to reflect Mark Coughran’s work connecting in from Austin to identify and solve these issues at the manufacturer’s plant.

## Leave a Reply

7 Comments on "Getting the Converted PID Values Right"

Greg expands on these tips in a Control Talk blog post, Checklist for PID Migration Tips- http://community.controlglobal.com/content/checklist-pid-migration-tips

[…] standard (ideal or ISA), and parallel. We highlighted the first two in an earlier post, Getting the Converted PID Values Right. The parallel form is not often applied in process control […]

Hi Rafael, Thanks for your kind words and question! Let me check with some colleagues and see if they can help clarify.

Hi Rafael, I received one more update from James. He had some time to show how the DeltaV PID Laplace equation reduces to the familiar Standard PID equation when Beta, Gamma are both set to 1.0 (or the Structure “P, I and D on Error”) is chosen. This also assumes that the KNL (non-linear gain) is set to 1.0 (or not activated).